Gossage is
often credited with invening interactive advertising before it was interactive.
But this
book shows that there is more to it.
Modern
interactive advertising means often not interaction but clicks and likes or get
them to product content for you (whatever that means). For Gossage the fun and
the greatness of interaction is in taking people serious. Doing something
worthwhile with their contributions. Respond to what they write or do and elevate it. To a place we couldn’t
reach ourselves. This way, all of his famous campaign are prime examples of
building communities (real communities of interest rather than facebook
groups).
“In contrast, Weiner & Gossage was less an
agency and more a mix of social club and symposium. (…) Very often long
conversations had nothing to do with the clients’ business: people were invited
to drop in and just spend the day in animated discussion with the agency boss.”
(Harrison, 2009, p.33).
“People read what interests them, and sometimes
it’s an ad.” (Gossage in Harrison, 2009, p.46). “Here he is explaining that
approach: “We can do one ad at a time. Literally, that’s the way we do it. We
do one advertisement and then wait to see what happens; and then we do another
advertisement. Oh, sometimes we get way ahead and do three. But when we do, we
often have to change the third one before it runs. Because if you put out an
advertisement that creates activity, or response, or involves the audience, you
will find that something has happened that changes the character of the
succeeding ads.” (Harrison, 2009, p.58).
“If, as Norbert Wiener asserted, feedback is a
method of controlling a system by reinserting into it the results of its
performance then, to Gossage, the adman and the audience were linked into one
inclusive information loop, and the feedback that came round that loop enabled
the adman to write ever more interesting and involving communications.”
(Harrison, 2009, p.61).
“”Gossage was certainly influenced by
information loops and the whole theory that things went out and came back and
went out and came back to you, and I think that’s what he tried to exploit. And
in a way I think it was a way of overcoming the loneliness of modern times.”
(Harrison, 2009, p.61).
“This waiting for feedback put Gossage under
extreme pressure. As his wife Sally recalls. “He was always under the gun
because he didn’t write a whole campaign ahead or anything like that. He’d get
inspired to write one piece, and he would wait and see what the response was.
But it always came and it always fed him, and he would be up all hours
fashioning the next one.”” (Harrison, 2009, p.62).
““I will go further and say that it is not only
wrong to attempt to influence an audience without involving it but it is
unethical and dishonest.”” (Harrison quoting Gossage, 2009, p.62).
“Answer: the humble coupon.” (Harrison, 2009,
p.63). “He’d put one in that said we’re not expecting you to buy anything, just
write to us some time and tell us how things are going’. That was a coupon! And
he would spring off of things that people wrote in and write another ad that
said ‘Bob from Dallas just wrote to us …’ He would make an ad out of the last thing
that happened. It was very interactive and very much like what happens on the
internet.” (Harrison quoting Jeff Goodby, 2009, p.63).
“”Never confuse the message with the product”.
By that he meant that while the advertisement might be for a certain product,
it wasn’t necessary for the ad to be about the product. “(Harrison, 2009,
p.64).
“In
defining a “pseudo-event”, Boorstin could easily have easily have been
describing any one of Gossage’s ideas: “It is planted primarily (not always
exclusively) for the immediate purpose of being reported or reproduced.
Therefore, its occurrence is arranged for the convenience of the reporting or
reproducing media. Its success is measured by how widely it is reported.”
(Harrison, 2009, p.81).
“Reality is not what happens but is controlled
by what is written.” (Harrison, 2009, p.82).
“As
Gossage explained, most advertising hitched a ride on the back of such media as
newspapers, magazines, radio and TV. It was advertising’s jobto catch the
audience’s attention by being as interesting, if not more so, than the content
around it. But, as he argued, in the case of billboards the content around it
was the countryside or the cityscape. And no “media owner” had the right to
sell that media because the view that the billboard was interrupting belonged
to the people.” (Harrison, 2009, p.87).
“McLuhan asserted that electronic Media were an
extension of our central nervous system. (…) they gave us a shared sensitivity
and sensibility that cut across such barriers as nationality, geography and
gender.” (Harrison, 2009, p.94).
“”Let
the audience in on the gag. Better still, let them know that you know that they
know; this makes it cozier and much more involving. You see, the objective is
not fun and games, but warmth and community of interest.” (Harrison, 2009,
p.106).
No comments:
Post a Comment